In 2024, when the feud between Kendrick Lamar and Drake seemed to consume every corner of the internet, I expected the usual when music becomes a competition. People would choose sides, defend their favorite artist, and spend more time arguing about who won than listening to what was being said.
The internet became a neighborhood block party with a thousand speakers, everybody playing something different, and at least one argument threatening to get out of hand.
What I didn’t expect was to find myself watching a Taylor Swift fan discover Kendrick Lamar.
Her name online was @vambie_reacts. She wasn’t simply listening for the next memorable verse or the next opportunity to applaud. She was trying to understand. She stopped to look up references. She explored the history behind the words. She approached music born from experiences different from her own with something I wish we practiced more often.
Curiosity.
Watching her made me ask a question I hadn’t expected to ask myself.
Was I willing to do the same?
I have spent much of my life listening to music that carries more than a melody. Music that remembers things people would rather forget. Music born in neighborhoods where joy and hardship have always occupied the same streets, sometimes the same homes.
Hip-hop is part of that history.
It is storytelling, protest, celebration, testimony, and sometimes a public record of things that never make it into the official record. A verse can carry a neighborhood’s weight. A rhythm can preserve a memory. A single line can say something about poverty, violence, family, or survival that an entire political speech struggles to explain.
Kendrick Lamar understands that responsibility.
His work reaches into Compton’s history, family relationships, religious traditions, the contradictions of American life, and the complicated business of being human. His music can be uncomfortable. It can be demanding. Sometimes understanding what he is saying requires knowing something about the world that produced him.
That is what made watching this particular listener so interesting.
She wasn’t asking Kendrick’s music to become something more familiar to her. She was making an effort to get to know it.
There is a difference.
We often treat the things we love as territories we must defend. Our music. Our traditions. Our culture. Our stories.
And sometimes that defensiveness comes from history.
Black American music has spent generations being celebrated, borrowed, repackaged, and commercialized, even while the people responsible for creating it were denied opportunities and recognition. Jazz, blues, gospel, rock and roll, soul, and hip-hop all carry histories that extend beyond entertainment.
So I understand why people protect what belongs to them.
But protection and isolation aren’t the same.
There is a difference between asking someone to respect where something came from and insisting they have no business trying to understand it.
Watching someone from an entirely different musical audience take the time to examine Kendrick Lamar’s work reminded me of that distinction.
It also reminded me that respect must travel both ways.
If I expect someone to listen carefully to the music that shaped my life, shouldn’t I be willing to listen just as carefully to the music that shaped theirs?
That question eventually led me to Taylor Swift.
When The Life of a Showgirl was released in October 2025, I decided to approach it with the same seriousness I had seen in someone else’s exploration of Kendrick Lamar.
Not because I had suddenly become a Swiftie.
I hadn’t.
Not because I felt obligated to enjoy the album, agree with everything it expressed, or discover some previously hidden affection for pop music.
I wanted to understand what people were hearing.
And perhaps, just as importantly, what I might have been missing.
We sometimes forget that none of us approaches music from a neutral place.
Our ears carry our histories.
Mine carry the Midwest and the South. They carry the sound of a kitchen radio playing. At the same time, someone prepares dinner, the bass comes from a cousin’s car, women sing in a church choir, and the familiar rhythm of music drifts through a neighborhood on a summer afternoon.
I remember music as something people lived with, not simply something they listened to.
It accompanied celebrations and funerals. It filled the silence after difficult conversations. It gave people permission to express feelings they might never have found the words to explain.
Sometimes a song was the only place where sorrow could be spoken without embarrassment.
Those experiences shaped the way I listen.
I tend to search for the history beneath the melody. I wonder what happened before the first verse, what memory someone is trying to preserve, and what truth might be hiding behind a particularly clever line.
But I also recognize that my experiences are not universal.
Other childhoods, other bedrooms, other family histories, and other songs became important to people for reasons I may never fully understand.
Taylor Swift’s music comes from a different artistic tradition than much of the music that shaped me. Her songwriting frequently draws from personal relationships, emotional vulnerability, memory, and the complicated experience of growing older while the world watches.
Her audience hears something in those stories.
For some, it may be the memory of a first heartbreak. For others, it may be the uncertainty of growing up, the humiliation of rejection, or the satisfaction of finally finding the words they wish they had spoken years earlier.
Those experiences are not foreign to me.
Their musical expression may be.
And that distinction matters.
Too often, we confuse unfamiliarity with a lack of substance.
We hear something that doesn’t immediately appeal to us and decide it’s not worth understanding. We dismiss entire genres because the instrumentation is different, the storytelling takes another form, or the audience doesn’t resemble us.
I have heard people dismiss hip-hop as noise without ever examining its language or history.
I’ve also heard people dismiss pop music as shallow simply because its accessibility makes its craftsmanship easier to overlook.
Both responses seem to me like judging a book by the room someone chooses to read it in.
Music is more than whether we play it at home.
There is the work.
The writing. The arrangement. The production. The decisions an artist makes about what to reveal, what to leave unsaid, and how to give a private experience meaning for someone else.
I can recognize those decisions without needing every song to move me.
That may be one of the most important things I have learned about listening.
Appreciation does not require affection.
I can admire a writer whose books I don’t particularly enjoy. I can appreciate the technique of a painter whose work I would never hang on my walls. I can recognize the discipline behind a meal prepared in a style I wouldn’t ordinarily choose.
Why should music be any different?
The problem begins when we confuse personal preference with an objective measure of artistic worth.
We decide that because something doesn’t speak to us, it has nothing worthwhile to say.
And perhaps that’s what made watching @vambie_reacts explore Kendrick Lamar so meaningful to me.
She demonstrated that you can enter someone else’s cultural world without expecting it to rearrange itself around your comfort.
You can encounter unfamiliar references and take the time to understand them.
You can acknowledge that a song speaks to experiences you have never lived.
You can appreciate the artistry without pretending that understanding a few albums makes you an authority on their history.
That kind of listening requires humility.
And humility is becoming increasingly rare in a culture that rewards certainty, speed, and the ability to deliver an opinion before we’ve finished considering the question.
Social media has made it remarkably easy to announce what we dislike.
Sometimes I wonder whether we’ve become so accustomed to defending our preferences that we’ve forgotten how to be surprised.
We divide ourselves into audiences, generations, political affiliations, and cultural identities. Then we allow those divisions to decide what deserves our attention.
We build little rooms around the things we already know, fill them with familiar voices, and call the arrangement comfort.
Eventually, anything outside the room begins to sound like an intrusion.
But music has always had a remarkable ability to cross those boundaries.
A young woman in Ohio and a young man in Compton may have very different upbringings. Yet, both may recognize the humiliation of rejection, the complicated love of family, or the feeling of being misunderstood.
They may not tell those stories using the same instruments or language.
That doesn’t mean the emotions are strangers.
It means the stories have traveled different roads.
And listening gives us a chance to see where those roads intersect.
I think about young people growing up in a world where nearly everything seems to demand allegiance.
Choose your side.
Defend your people.
Decide who won.
Decide who lost.
And whatever you do, don’t let anyone catch you appreciating something associated with the other side.
What a small world that creates.
I would rather they see adults capable of curiosity. People who can listen to something unfamiliar without immediately searching for a reason to reject it. People who understand that changing their perspective isn’t necessarily a betrayal of the things they already love.
I want them to understand that knowing more about someone else’s world does not require abandoning their own.
It simply means their understanding has grown.
There are limits, of course.
Listening does not require agreement. Understanding an artist’s intentions does not mean approving of everything they express. Acknowledging the value of another person’s experience doesn’t erase the differences between us.
Not every song will reach me.
Not every lyric will mean what its author intended.
Some music may remain outside my preferences no matter how carefully I listen.
And that’s perfectly fine.
The objective was never to make every piece of music my favorite.
The objective was to stop assuming that my preferences established the boundaries of what deserved serious consideration.
That realization brings a certain freedom.
I can remain deeply connected to the music that shaped me while making room to understand music that shaped someone else.
I don’t lose Kendrick Lamar by listening to Taylor Swift.
I don’t lose the blues, the gospel songs, the soul records, or the hip-hop that helped form my understanding of the world.
Those things remain part of me.
What changes is my willingness to recognize that other people have their own musical histories, equally capable of carrying memory, grief, joy, and meaning.
If someone can take the time to understand the stories told through music born in Compton, I can take the time to understand the stories told through a Taylor Swift album.
Not to balance some cultural ledger.
Not to demonstrate how open-minded I am.
But because reciprocity means little if we practice it only when it’s convenient.
I began this journey because I watched someone approach unfamiliar music with patience and respect.
What stayed with me wasn’t the outcome of the rap feud or the argument over which artist had won.
It was seeing someone choose understanding over dismissal.
That seemed worth remembering.
Especially now, when so much of our public conversation has become an exercise in talking past one another.
We are surrounded by opinions, yet often starved for understanding. We have more ways to communicate than any generation before us, yet we still make listening feel like an extraordinary act.
Maybe the answer isn’t always another argument.
Maybe sometimes it begins with a pair of headphones, an unfamiliar album, and the willingness to admit that another person’s experience may contain something we haven’t yet learned.
We don’t have to love the same music.
We don’t have to share the same memories.
We don’t even have to agree about what makes a song beautiful.
But we can offer one another the courtesy of listening before deciding.
Because sometimes the most meaningful thing we can do is recognize when a voice deserves to be heard, even when it isn’t singing our song.
And sometimes, if we’re fortunate, we discover that the distance between us was never quite as wide as we imagined.
If something here speaks to you, please like, comment, and share.
Support Salt, Ink & Soul
The stories, recipes, and reflections continue beyond the page. Visit the Salt, Ink & Soul Store to explore merchandise inspired by Food. Memory. Meaning.
👉 Visit the Salt, Ink & Soul Store
Resources for Hard Times
For practical help, food support, or community resources, visit the Salt, Ink & Soul Resources Page.
