Who Gets to Be an Expert?

Somewhere along the way, the word expert got dressed up.

It put on a clean apron and started speaking in polished sentences. It learned how to name every acid, every cut, and every technique, the way some people learn scripture—precise, rehearsed, confident. It started arriving with credentials. With ratings. With a camera angle. With a voice that sounds like it already knows it’s right.

And I’m not here to mock skill. Skill is real. Craft matters. Discipline matters. There’s beauty in someone who has spent years learning a thing until their hands don’t have to think about it anymore.

But I’ve been watching how authority gets handed out.

Who gets to hold it?

Who gets ignored?

Because I know cooks whose food will stop you mid-bite—not because you’re analyzing anything, not because you’re performing appreciation the way you were taught to, but because something inside you goes quiet for a second.

Not silence like politeness.

Silence like recognition.

That’s the kind of moment I trust.

My own belief is simple, even if it’s heavy: the people who get to determine who is an expert are the ones who eat and feel that all-encompassing satisfaction and gratitude. The ones who take a spoonful or a bite, and it stops them—not because they’re dissecting ingredients, but because it has touched their soul. Their spirit. Those parts that make us truly us.

It satisfied their hunger.

And it blessed their spirit.

To me, those are the ones who get to decide.

Not the loudest voice in the room.

Not the person with the best lighting.

Not the one who can turn dinner into a performance review.

The ones at the table.

Because food, at its honest center, is not a debate. It’s a communion. It’s a small, daily miracle that too many people are forced to negotiate with—money, time, fatigue, scarcity, stress—all of it pressing down like weather. And then someone makes something anyway. Something warm. Something that holds.

If a meal can do that—if it can steady a person, if it can return them to themselves, if it can make their shoulders drop in relief—what are we really supposed to call the one who made it?

An amateur?

A “home cook,” said the way people say less than?

We live in a world that mistakes visibility for validity. If you can describe what you did in the right vocabulary, you’re treated like an expert. If you can plate it like a magazine cover, you’re treated like an expert. If you can turn the meal into content, into a brand, into a series—then the world hands you the title and nods as if that settles the matter.

But plenty of the best food I’ve ever encountered wouldn’t survive that kind of spotlight.

It wasn’t made to impress strangers.

It was made to take care of somebody.

And that kind of care has its own standards.

The best cooks I know aren’t always chasing innovation. Sometimes they’re chasing enough. Sometimes they’re chasing right. Sometimes they’re trying to make sure the child who didn’t eat at school gets something in their belly before bedtime. Sometimes they’re trying to make Sunday feel like Sunday, even when the week has been cruel.

That’s not romantic. That’s real.

And if you want to talk about expertise, you have to talk about repetition. The kind that doesn’t look glamorous but builds a person into someone you can trust.

There is expertise in making the same dish fifty times until you understand its moods.

Until you know the difference between heat and impatience.

Until you can tell, by smell alone, when something is about to cross the line.

There is expertise in cooking with what you have and still making it taste like dignity.

There is expertise in a kitchen where nobody measures, but nothing is careless.

And for us—especially in Black kitchens—this is not new.

Our culture has always carried genius in ordinary containers. We didn’t always have the luxury of experimentation for fun. We had to make the function taste like joy. We had to turn “not much” into “enough” and sometimes into a feast, not because we were trying to impress, but because we were trying to remain human under conditions that kept insisting we were disposable.

That’s expertise.

Not the kind that needs to announce itself.

The kind that survives.

So when I ask who gets to be an expert, I’m not asking for a title to hand out. I’m asking a quieter question:

Who do we trust?

Do we trust the person with the cleanest story, the best branding, the most followers?

Or do we trust the one whose food has carried people through real life?

I think about the moment a person tastes something, and their eyes shift—not wide for show, not performative, just… softened. Like the body recognizes safety. Like the spirit exhales. Like something inside them says, I remember this. Even if they’ve never had this exact dish before.

That’s the moment I mean.

That moment is a kind of witness.

And witnesses matter.

Because food is not only fuel. It’s memory. It’s mood. It’s belonging. It’s how we tell people, in the simplest language we have, I see you.

If the world wants to measure expertise by technique alone, it will keep missing the point.

Technique can be learned.

But the ability to feed someone in a way that makes them feel held?

That takes attention.

That takes empathy.

That takes a kind of spiritual accuracy that can’t be faked.

And yes, I know—people will say this is sentimental. Too soft. Too unscientific.

But I don’t trust a world that treats satisfaction like something shallow. I don’t trust a world that turns eating into analysis and forgets that the body is not a machine. The body is a living story, carrying stress and grief and history. Sometimes the most skilled thing you can do is make a meal that lets somebody come home to themselves for a moment.

So here’s where I land:

The expert is not always the one who explains the food best.

The expert is the one who makes you stop mid-bite—not to evaluate, but to feel grateful. The one who satisfies hunger and blesses the spirit. The one whose food doesn’t just taste good, but makes you feel less alone inside your own life.

And the people who know that—the people who have felt that—those are the ones who get to decide.

Not because they’re critics.

Because they’re human.

Because they are the reason cooking matters at all.

And if the world never hands that cook a title, the table still will.

Quietly.

In the only way that counts.

Kyle J. Hayes

kylehayesblog.com

Please like, comment, and share

Resources for Hard Times

If you’re looking for practical help, food support, or community resources, you can visit the Salt, Ink & Soul Resources Page.

👉 Resources for Hard Times